References: Response Devices

Return to Response Devices strategy page.

References

Agarwal, P. K., D'Antonio, L., Roediger III, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Classroom-based programs of retrieval practice reduce middle school and high school students' test anxiety. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 131-139.

Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.

Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822-847.

Marlow, D. W., Wash, P. D., Chapman, J. M., & Dale, T. M. (2009). Electric Engagement: The Use of Classroom Response Technology in Four Disciplines. Currents in Teaching & Learning, 2(1), 17-27.

Medina, E. G. L., & Hurtado, C. P. R. (2017). Kahoot! A digital tool for learning vocabulary in a language classroom. Revista Publicando, 4(12 (1)), 441-449.

Moratelli, K., & DeJarnette, N. K. (2014). Clickers to the rescue: Technology integration helps boost literacy scores. The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 586-593.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004, April). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA (pp. 1-8).