Return to Response Devices strategy page.
Barth-Cohen, L. A., Smith, M. K., Capps, D. K., Lewin, J. D., Shemwell, J. T., & Stetzer, M. R. (2016). What are middle school students talking about during clicker questions? Characterizing small-group conversations mediated by classroom response systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 50-61.
Dieker, L. A., Delisio, L., & Bukaty, C. (2015). Tuning in with technology. In W. W. Murawski & K. L. Scott (Eds.), What really works in elementary education: Research-based practical strategies for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hudson, T. (2017). Six strategies to reach, teach, and close math gaps for Latino English language learners in elementary and middle school. Bellevue, WA: DreamBox Learning.
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.
Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822-847.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education,_ 93_(3), 223-231.
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004, April). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA (pp. 1-8).